A Facebook post by historian Vicente Rafael on “gated-community democracy” versus Binay politics sent me searching for a book I downloaded a while back. The politician who shares his philosophy reminds me of Binay. I wouldn’t be surprised if Binay has read the book and taken its lessons to heart.
Below is an except from the book – “Plunkitt of Tammany Hall-
A Series of Very Plain Talks on Very Practical Politics, Delivered by Ex-senator George Washington Plunkitt, the Tammany Philosopher, from His Rostrum — the New York County Court House Bootblack Stand”.
“Brought up in Tammany Hall, he has learned how to reach the hearts of the great mass of voters. He does not bother about reaching their heads. It is his belief that arguments and campaign literature have never gained votes.
“He seeks direct contact with the people, does them good turns when he can, and relies on their not forgetting him on election day. His heart is always in his work, too, for his subsistence depends on its results.
“If he holds his district and Tammany is in power, he is amply rewarded by a good office and the opportunities that go with it. What these opportunities are has been shown by the quick rise to wealth of so many Tammany district leaders.”
(The Tammany Hall Society was founded in 1789, it gained influence over New York City politics shortly after it was founded and maintained its position, with a few interruptions, until the 1930′s when Republican Fiorello La Guardia helped by Democrat Franklin Roosevelt won the election for mayor of New York city.)
Here is an entire chapter from the book.
“Chapter 23. Strenuous Life of the Tammany District Leader
Author’s Note: This chapter is based on extracts from Plunkitt’s Diary and on my daily observation of the work of the district leader. – W.L.R.
THE life of the Tammany district leader is strenuous. To his work is due the wonderful recuperative power of the organization.
One year it goes down in defeat and the prediction is made that it will never again raise its head. The district leader, undaunted by defeat, collects his scattered forces, organizes them as only Tammany knows how to organize, and in a little while the organization is as strong as ever.
No other politician in New York or elsewhere is exactly like the Tammany district leader or works as he does. As a rule, he has no business or occupation other than politics. He plays politics every day and night in the year, and his headquarters bears the inscription, “Never closed.”
Everybody in the district knows him. Everybody knows where to find him, and nearly everybody goes to him for assistance of one sort or another, especially the poor of the tenements.
He is always obliging. He will go to the police courts to put in a good word for the “drunks and disorderlies” or pay their fines, if a good word is not effective. He will attend christenings, weddings, and funerals. He will feed the hungry and help bury the dead.
A philanthropist? Not at all He is playing politics all the time.
Brought up in Tammany Hall, he has learned how to reach the hearts of the great mass of voters. He does not bother about reaching their heads. It is his belief that arguments and campaign literature have never gained votes.
He seeks direct contact with the people, does them good turns when he can, and relies on their not forgetting him on election day. His heart is always in his work, too, for his subsistence depends on its results.
If he holds his district and Tammany is in power, he is amply rewarded by a good office and the opportunities that go with it. What these opportunities are has been shown by the quick rise to wealth of so many Tammany district leaders. With the examples before him of Richard Croker, once leader of the Twentieth District; John F. Carroll, formerly leader of the Twenty-ninth; Timothy (“Dry Dollar”) Sullivan, late leader of the Sixth, and many others, he can always look forward to riches and ease while he is going through the drudgery of his daily routine.
This is a record of a day’s work by Plunkitt:
2 A.M.: Aroused from sleep by the ringing Of his doorbell; went to the door and found a bartender, who asked him to go to the police station and ball out a saloon-keeper who had been arrested for violating the excise law. Furnished bail and returned to bed at three o’clock.
6 .A.M.: Awakened by fire engines passing his house. Hastened to the scene of the fire, according to the custom of the Tammany district leaders, to give assistance to the fire sufferers, if needed. Met several of his election district captains who are always under orders to look out for fires, which are considered great vote-getters. Found several tenants who had been burned out, took them to a hotel, supplied them with clothes, fed them, and arranged temporary quarters for them until they could rent and furnish new apartments.
8:30 A.M.: Went to the police court to look after his constituents. Found six “drunks.” Secured the discharge of four by a timely word with the judge, and paid the fines of two.
9 A.M.: Appeared in the Municipal District Court. Directed one of his district captains to act as counsel for a widow against whom dispossess proceedings had been instituted and obtained an extension of time. Paid the rent of a poor family about to be dispossessed and gave them a dollar for food.
11 A.M.: At home again. Found four men waiting for him. One had been discharged by the Metropolitan Rail way Company for neglect of duty, and wanted the district leader to fix things. Another wanted a job on the road. The third sought a place on the Subway and the fourth, a plumber, was looking for work with the Consolidated Gas Company. The district leader spent nearly three hours fixing things for the four men, and succeeded in each case.
3 P.M.: Attended the funeral of an Italian as far as the ferry. Hurried back to make his appearance at the funeral of a Hebrew constituent. Went conspicuously to the front both in the Catholic church and the synagogue, and later attended the Hebrew confirmation ceremonies in the synagogue.
7 P.M.: Went to district headquarters and presided over a meeting of election district captains. Each captain submitted a list of all the voters in his district, reported on their attitude toward Tammany, suggested who might be won over and how they could be won, told who were in need, and who were in trouble of any kind and the best way to reach them. District leader took notes and gave orders.
8 P.M.: Went to a church fair. Took chances on everything, bought ice cream for the young girls and the children. Kissed the little ones, flattered their mother: and took their fathers out for something down at the comer.
9 P.M.: At the clubhouse again. Spent $l0 on tickets for a church excursion and promised a subscription for a new church bell. Bought tickets for a baseball game to be played by two nines from his district. Listened to the complaints of a dozen pushcart peddlers who said they were persecuted by the police and assured them he would go to Police Headquarter: in the morning and see about it.
10:30 P.M.: Attended a Hebrew wedding reception and dance. Had previously sent a handsome wedding present to the bride.
12 P.M.: In bed.
That is the actual record of one day in the life of Plunkitt. He does some of the same things every day, but his life is not so monotonous as to be wearisome. Sometimes the work of a district leader is exciting, especially if he happens to have a rival who intends to make a contest for the leadership at the primaries. In that case, he is even more alert, tries to reach the fires before his rival, sends out runners to look for “drunks and disorderlies” at the police stations, and keeps a very dose watch on the obituary columns of the newspapers. A few years ago there was a bitter contest for the Tammany leadership of the Ninth District between John C. Sheehan and Frank J. Goodwin. Both had had long experience in Tammany politics and both understood every move of the game.
Every morning their agents went to their respective headquarters before seven o’clock and read through the death notices in all the morning papers. If they found that anybody in the district had died, they rushed to the homes of their principals with the information and then there was a race to the house of the deceased to offer condolences, and, if the family were poor, something more substantial.
On the day of the funeral there was another contest. Each faction tried to surpass the other in the number and appearance of the carriages it sent to the funeral, and more than once they almost came to blows at the church or in the cemetery.
On one occasion the Goodwinites played a trick on their adversaries which has since been imitated in other districts. A well-known liquor dealer who had a considerable following died, and both Sheehan and Goodwin were eager to become his political heir by making a big showing at the funeral.
Goodwin managed to catch the enemy napping. He went to all the livery stables in the district, hired all the carriages for the day, and gave orders to two hundred of his men to be on hand as mourners.
Sheehan had never had any trouble about getting all the carriages that he wanted, so he let the matter go until the night before the funeral. Then he found that he could not hire a carriage in the district.
He called his district committee together in a hurry and explained the situation to them. He could get all the vehicles he needed in the adjoining district, he said, but if he did that, Goodwin would rouse the voters of the Ninth by declaring that he (Sheehan) had patronized foreign industries.
Finally, it was decided that there was nothing to do but to go over to Sixth Avenue and Broadway for carriages. Sheehan made a fine turnout at the funeral, but the deceased was hardly in his grave before Goodwin raised the cry of “Protection to home industries,” and denounced his rival for patronizing livery-stable keepers outside of his district. The err’ had its effect in the primary campaign. At all events, Goodwin was elected leader.
A recent contest for the leadership of the Second District illustrated further the strenuous work of the Tammany district leaders. The contestants were Patrick Divver, who had managed the district for years, and Thomas F. Foley.
Both were particularly anxious to secure the large Italian vote. They not only attended all the Italian christenings and funerals, but also kept a close lookout for the marriages in order to be on hand with wedding presents.
At first, each had his own reporter in the Italian quarter to keep track of the marriages. Later, Foley conceived a better plan. He hired a man to stay all day at the City Hall marriage bureau, where most Italian couples go through the civil ceremony, and telephone to him at his saloon when anything was doing at the bureau.
Foley had a number of presents ready for use and, whenever he received a telephone message from his man, he hastened to the City Hall with a ring or a watch or a piece of silver and handed it to the bride with his congratulations. As a consequence, when Divver got the news and went to the home of the couple with his present, he always found that Foley had been ahead of him. Toward the end of the campaign, Divver also stationed a man at the marriage bureau and then there were daily foot races and fights between the two heelers.
Sometimes the rivals came into conflict at the death-bed. One night a poor Italian peddler died in Roosevelt Street. The news reached Divver and Foley about the same time, and as they knew the family of the man was destitute, each went to an undertaker and brought him to the Roosevelt Street tenement.
The rivals and the undertakers met at the house and an altercation ensued. After much discussion the Divver undertaker was selected. Foley had more carriages at the funeral, however, and he further impressed the Italian voters by paying the widow’s rent for a month, and sending her half a ton of coal and a barrel of flour.
The rivals were put on their mettle toward the end of the campaign by the wedding of a daughter of one of the original Cohens of the Baxter Street region. The Hebrew vote in the district is nearly as large as the Italian vote, and Divver and Foley set out to capture the Cohens and their friends.
They stayed up nights thinking what they would give the bride. Neither knew how much the other was prepared to spend on a wedding present, or what form it would take; so spies were employed by both sides to keep watch on the jewelry stores, and the jewelers of the district were bribed by each side to impart the desired information.
At last Foley heard that Divver had purchased a set of silver knives, forks and spoons. He at once bought a duplicate set and added a silver tea service. When the presents were displayed at the home of the bride, Divver was not in a pleasant mood and he charged his jeweler with treachery. It may be added that Foley won at the primaries.
One of the fixed duties of a Tammany district leader is to give two outings every summer, one for the men of his district and the other for the women and children, and a beefsteak dinner and a ball every winter. The scene of the outings is, usually, one of the groves along the Sound.
The ambition of the district leader on these occasions is to demonstrate that his men have broken all records in the matter of eating and drinking. He gives out the exact number of pounds of beef, poultry, butter, etc., that they have consumed and professes to know how many potatoes and ears of corn have been served.
According to his figures, the average eating record of each man at the outing is about ten pounds of beef, two or three chickens, a pound of butter, a half peck of potatoes, and two dozen ears of corn. The drinking records, as given out, are still more phenomenal. For some reason, not yet explained, the district leader thinks that his popularity will be greatly increased if he can show that his followers can eat and drink more than the followers of any other district leader.
The same idea governs the beefsteak dinners in the winter. It matters not what sort of steak is served or how it is cooked; the district leader considers only the question of quantity, and when he excels all others in this particular, he feels, somehow, that he is a bigger man and deserves more patronage than his associates in the Tammany Executive Committee.
As to the balls, they are the events of the winter in the extreme East Side and West Side society. Mamie and Maggie and Jennie prepare for them months in advance, and their young men save up for the occasion just as they save for the summer trips to Coney Island.
The district leader is in his glory at the opening of the ball He leads the cotillion with the prettiest woman present – his wife, if he has one, permitting – and spends almost the whole night shaking hands with his constituents. The ball costs him a pretty penny, but he has found that the investment pays.
By these means the Tammany district leader reaches out into the homes of his district, keeps watch not only on the men, but also on the women and children; knows their needs, their likes and dislikes, their troubles and their hopes, and places himself in a position to use his knowledge for the benefit of his organization and himself. Is it any wonder that scandals do not permanently disable Tammany and that it speedily recovers from what seems to be crushing defeat?”
Folks, it doesn’t get any better than this. The National Transformation Council held a 50-minute press-con featuring Kit Tatad, Norberto Gonzales, Renato Corona, Pastor Gregor Belgica backed by Archbekis Ramon Arguelles and Fernando Capalla, Fr Jocson Ogaya, a representative of Bayombong Bishop Ramon Villena, and Bishop Butch Belgica.
“We have no positions in the council. We work as a collegial body. So we don’t have a boss…We just happened to match each other’s sentiments and opinions. We spoke to each other. And then of course what has been agreed upon in the beginning is this: That the problem of our society has gone beyond politics, that we have to begin by invoking the moral basis of our action,” said Gonzales.
“Collective leadership is better. It’s collective,” Archbeki Arguelles said in Filipino. The Lipa archdiocese provided the venue and the food for the participants for free because it is “generous”, according to the Archbeki.
And so it goes…
Mukhang hatî ang CBCP.
Rappler reported Cebu Archbishop Jose Palma was not going along with the 4 Archbeki’s who want to oust PNoy.
“Palma, a former CBCP president, said the Catholic Church “respects the opinions and sentiments of the citizens who are calling for the President’s resignation.” “However,” Palma said, “the Church is not in the position to issue such political statements for it is beyond her competence.”
Pero matigas mga malambot. Reacting to Justoce Secretary De Lima’s warning that she would not hesitate to charge them for sedition if they cross the line Bayombong Bishop Ramon Villena said, “I challenge Secretary De Lima to convict me of sedition. I am ready to go to prison perhaps together with Archbishop Ramon Arguelles of Lipa, so that by then we can serve the poor in prison.”
Baka naman he meant they were going to service their fellow inmates.
Just done watching CITIZENFOUR, the Academy Award winning docu on Edward Snowden’s exposé. Downloaded it from the usual suspected public service providers.
Some people think Snowden is a traitor, others think is a hero. Me? I’m grateful he told the world what I have all suspected all along – that personal privacy is just a myth now.
But the movie is larger than Snowden, it is, as Snowden said, about the Rulers and the Ruled instead of the Elected and the Electorate. His thesis is without privacy there can be no democracy.
Anyway, the movie also got me thinking about things.
1. On the issue of privacy as a human right, Barack is just Cheney in black face. But that’s not to say that Barack is a complete asshole because he did do positive stuff in other areas…Just goes to show that it’s difficult for a leader or for that matter anyone to be all things to all people. And so to focus on one aspect of a leader’s leadership at the expense of seeing the full panorama of his work is not only narrow, it is also selling one’s self short.
2. But there’s also another issue that I still can’t get a handle on. National security.
Is it identical to an individual’s right to life, a right that supercedes all other rights? Is the nation more important than the individuals that comprise it? When the USSR disappeared, was it a gain or loss for humanity in terms of citizens being able to enjoy their inalienable rights as humans?
3. And now the US. The US government is taking away its citizens’ inalienable rights in the name of national security. By so doing, is it protecting and perpuating itself at the expense of its citizens and the principles it stands for?
It has been said “sometimes we have to kill democracy in order to save it” (that’s the national security logic) but that’s truthiness because when you kill democracy in order to save it then what you are actually doing is killing the real thing and replacing it with a myth.
And so we go back to Snowden’s question: The Rulers and the Ruled or the Elected and the Electorate?
The scary thing about an all-out war on the BIFF and bandits like the ASG is they can retaliate with an all-out terror bombing campaign in MetroManila. They’ve done it before – remember the super ferry and the bus and lrt bombings? – and they can do it again.
All the drones and the NSA snooping in the world will not prevent anybody determined enough to do it. Think about that all you chickenhawk madapakas; you who believe your genocide dreams can be contained in Mindanao.
Be smart, talk peace don’t force them to strike back with terror bombings. Support the BBL, give the moros their Bangsamoro – they’re going to get it one way or the other anyway, partner with the MILF – they have given up their fight for independence, and together we fight terrorists and bandits and bring peace to Mindanao under one constitution and one flag.
Don’t be stupid. The only thing that ever came from chickenhawks is chicken shit.
Prove that Filipinos are smarter than Americans who have spent trillions of dollars eating chickenhawk shit and are still spending for more of it. We can enjoy peace if we stay rational and distant from those flag-waving chickenhawk madapakas.
Stupids die..for the dumbest reasons.
Binay favors house arrest for Enrile and Arroyo.
“Senator Enrile is 91 years old. He needs medical attention for several ailments and medical conditions that go with his advanced age. His on-going bout with pneumonia shows the fragility of his physical state. House arrest for him would be the compassionate thing to do,” said Binay, Enrile’s fellow stalwart in the political party, United Nationalist Alliance.
On Arroyo: ”She is also of frail health. Her petition for house arrest is being opposed by government prosecutors and her case has barely moved in court. The fact that the former president is a political opponent should not deprive her of the compassion that should be extended to all detainees similarly situated, regardless of political affiliation,” Binay said.
“We cannot have a just society that applies the principle of accountability to the powerless and the principle of forgiveness to the powerful” – Chris Hayes, journalist
Say mo ngayon, Maligno?
Fifteen minutes with Rep. Neri Colmenares of BayanMuna.
Host: The extreme left Makabayan bloc and some bishops in the extreme right of the CBCP have joined forces calling for the resignation or ouster of Pres. Aquino…
Co-host: The joining of two forces from opposite ends of the political spectrum has led to some confusion among non-extremists…or as some of us would prefer to be called, the sane majority.
Host: Fulfilling our mission to minimize confusion in our society, we decided to interview a leading member of the Makabayan bloc, BayanMuna representative Bishop Neri Colmenares.
Co-host:Excuse me, ka-tandem, but Rep Colmenares is not a bishop, he is a comrade.
Host: Hah? Ganun ba? E nakita mo na, maski tayo na ang trabaho ay mag-paliwanag naguguluhan na rin.
Co-host: I don’t blame you, partner. There is really grounds for confusion because they are mouthing the same line.
Host: Yun na nga, same line pero different hats… Mao caps and mitres…
Co-host: Let’s get on with the show…Tonight we have Bishop I mean comrade Rep. Neri Colmenares of BayanMuna as guest. We invited him here to clarify his call for the president’s resignation or ouster.
Colmenares:Good evening po.
Host: Bishop Colmenares, have you thought through the consequences of what you want to happen?
Colmenares: I am not a bishop, comrade na lang po… Anyway the answer to your question is, “Whoever will replace Aquino that will be the decision of the people. We should not take a position based on who will take over. Our position is the President has sinned and he should be made to pay. Our only consideration is for the public’s interest for the President not to remain in office a day longer, otherwise, we will suffer a repeat of the EDCA, DAP, and Mamasapano.”
Host: Your Eminence…(Colmenares interrupts, “Uulitin ko po, hindi po ako bishop”) E kasi naman you said your position is the President has sinned so akala ko ang concern mo ay sin…and sin is the concern of bishops, diba? Anyway, as I was about to say, before you interrupted me…if the president resigns, then Binay succeeds him; if the president is ousted, then a junta takes over. Do you see a third option?
Colmenares: Allow me to repeat the last part of my statement. I think that will explain our position more clearly – “Our only consideration is for the public’s interest for the President not to remain in office a day longer, otherwise, we will suffer a repeat of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, Disbursement Acceleration Program and Mamasapano.”
Co-host: Fair enough let’s see if we can understand why you singled out Pres. Aquino as the root cause of all of the nation’s problems. So let’s tackle the issues one by one, starting with DAP. The Supreme Court just ruled on DAP. Don’t you think that pretty much solves that problem?
Colmenares: No, because DAP can come back in some other form.
Host: Well, if it comes back in some other form then it won’t be DAP, it will be something else so what is it really that you are against? Are you against giving the Chief Executive any discretion whatsoever in the management of national priorities or are you against local governments and district representatives earmarking funds in the national budget for projects and programs that their jurisdictions really need? Or are you against both?
Colmenares: I am against pork barrel.
Co-host:You availed of more than P400M in PDAF for your pet projects, was that pork or did that P400M help those in need or not?
Colmenares: Well we condemned PDAF…
Host: But that condemnation is P400M too late… and it came after public opinion associated all PDAF with corruption.
Colmenares: That’s not fair.
Host: But that’s what happened. Also, are you willing to commit that henceforth Bayan and other members of the Makabayan bloc will never again sponsor or insert any item in the national budget since you are against any form of appropriations that resembles pork barrel?
Colmenares: That’s not fair.
Host: Okay, so you won’t commit. And so DAP or whatever new form it takes will always be with us, with or without Aquino, with or without you and your party, or Binay, or a junta running government.
Colmenares: That’s not true.
Co-host: Well, the fact of the matter is any and all governments have to spend for programs and projects and any and all government’s have to set priorities so those who are not prioritized will call that kind of spending pork barrel and wasteful and those who are prioritized will say the government is doing its job and spending money where it needs to be spent. Don’t you think that what we need are safeguards to ensure that the “pork” will not be pocketed by corrupt politicians instead of an outright ban on prioritized spending? Anyway, let’s move on to your fear of a repeat of Mamasapano.
Host: Are you saying that Mamasapano will not be repeated if Aquino is not president?
Co-host: Because without Aquino the planning of special ops and their execution will be perfect?
Colmenares: I didn’t say that!
Host: Well, you said you did not want the President to stay a day longer, otherwise there would be a repeat of Mamasapano. Were you talking about something bigger than planning and execution?
Colmenares: Yes. We want peace and Aquino is the obstacle to peace.
Host:The government is holding peace talks with the MILF because both the government and the MILF want to end the 40-year war. The government also wants to sit down and talk peace with your people. Is the NDF willing to talk peace?
Colmenares: The NDF is willing to talk peace but the problem is Aquino, he won’t agree to our pre-conditions.
Co-host: So you will sit down at the negotiation table only if President Aquino agrees to your demands?
Colmenares: Hindi naman ganun, besides reasonable naman ang demands namin tulad ng abrogation of all defense agreements and treaties with the US; nationalization of all public utilities, the oil industry, and extractive industries; transformation of all agricultural lands into collectives at iba pang mga bagay na tumutugma sa aming ideology.
Host: I see. Well, I guess all we can say at this point is, “Goodnight and sweet dreams” na lang to you.
Colmenares: Hindi kasalanan mangarap at managinip
Hosts: True that but then again you know what they say, “one man’s dream is another man’s nightmare.”
Station voice-over: “At sa mga nagbabagang balita, bakit si Kris nag-unfriend at nag-unfollow sa mga kasama niya sa showbiz? Abangan ang sagot mula kay Tito Boy…Susunod!”
Missteps undermined the message of the President’s speech at the Necrological Service for the fallen SAF personnel.
Misstep 1 :
He failed to take responsibility for the tragedy. It was his responsibility as Commander in Chief. Period. So take responsibility and then order a Board of Inquiry to look at the incident from start to finish, find where lapses, if any, occurred, and learn from mistakes.
Misstep 2 :
He failed to emphatize. A national tragedy overrides any previous commitments, even a scheduled State Visit. Drop everything. Period. Meet your fallen soldiers at the airport and spend a few hours with each and every grieving family. Nothing is more important for those families and the nation at that point.
Had he taken responsibility and shared in the grief of the families, the nation would have been more receptive to his crucial message: that we must not allow grief to overwhelm us and anger to blind us in our quest for peace.
Well, nobody’s perfect.