It’s nice that Binay condoled with Jennifer’s family. It’s even nicer that there was a reporter/photographer from the Philippine Daily Inquirer to record the event.
Interesting column in the “Young Blood” (youth voices) section of the Inquirer.
All I can say to the young man is “Hijo, ang problema ay dun sa nanliligaw at hindi dun sa liniligawan.”
“Kung hindi mo mapasagot ang liniligawan mo sa style mong pagligaw siguro ang tamang gawain ay tignan kung saan ka nagkukulang. Huwag mo nang ipagpilitan ang style na bulok at lalo nang huwag kang magpamukhang martyr kasi talagang mababusted ka.”
Here’s the drift of the op-ed:
By Jayson Arvene T. Mondragon
“We don’t go out in the streets under the blistering sun or the pouring rain, get hosed down or clapped in jail, just to see and hear the people we are fighting for looking down on us like we’re nothing more than a nuisance. And truth be told, that’s exactly how most people see activists: just another nuisance in their life. For most, activists are just the people who caused the traffic that made them get to school or the office late, just a noisy bunch of know-it-alls who “waste” their time shouting in the streets instead of “doing something good in their life.
“Yes, like most people, we can choose to put the placards down and live a life like everyone else. Instead of shouting in the streets, we can be part of the growing commercialization of the country, and, judging from how artistic and creative most mobilizations are, we’ll probably be good at it. Instead of getting hosed down with dirty water after a day of walking in the sun fighting for a cause, we can actually get a job and clock out after five and go home to a luxurious hot shower. (Most real activists actually have jobs because we also know that fighting for a cause costs a lot.)”
Wow, woe is me, sincere and only trying to do what I think is best for you. Anong gusto mong mangayri? Sabihin ng liniligawan mo, “Nakakaawa naman siya sagutin ko na lang”, yun ba? Crying in the rain. Pweh!
This report, headlined as “No Lost Decade under GMA”, written by Paolo Romero contains a glaring omission. I’m posting the report in full. See if you can spot what Paolo Romero left out of the report.
‘No lost decade under GMA’
By Paolo Romero
The economic and fiscal reforms instituted by former President and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo continues to benefit the country and help protect it from external challenges, a former finance chief said yesterday.
Former finance secretary Margarito Teves was commenting on President Aquino’s repeated assertions that Arroyo’s term from 2001 to 2010 was “a lost decade” for the country’s economy.
Teves, who has been cited as “Asia’s Best Finance Minister” during his stint in government, said the Arroyo administration had laid the foundation which resulted in the Philippines’ credit rating upgrades which started during her term and shortly after she stepped down from office.
“Data show that contrary to President Aquino’s reference to the Arroyo administration as a ‘lost decade,’ the Arroyo administration and Department of Finance had initiated several positive reforms that are benefiting the Philippine economy until today,” he pointed out.
Teves noted that Arroyo’s prudent management of the national government debt and the passage of legislation in support of financial market development like the reformed value added tax have contributed to the strong fiscal performance of the country, which resulted in credit outlook upgrades from negative to stable during the Arroyo administration and positive shortly after July 2010.
He said that Fitch’s upgrade in March 2013 noted that it was Arroyo’s “improvements in fiscal management…that made general government debt dynamics more resilient to shocks.”
Teves recounted that the Arroyo administration’s strong focus on tax reforms also paved the way for increased tax collection revenue, generating the highest revenues by any single measure adopted under any administration.
Arroyo’s Strong Republic Nautical Highway also improved connectivity in the country by integrating land and sea modes of transportation. Indonesia later followed the SRNH model.
Teves stressed that President Aquino should give credit to Arroyo and members of her finance team by acknowledging their contributions in building a stronger economy.
“I believe it would be fair to give credit to former President Arroyo and our colleagues at the Department of Finance for the hard work they have done from 2005 to 2010 and acknowledge the contributions of the previous administration in building the foundations of a stronger economy,” Teves said.
When asked to assess the Aquino administration, Teves said he is commending the administration for sustaining the economic growth that was initiated during Arroyo’s term. But he noted that the growth is still not inclusive.
He said the Aquino administration and the next administration must raise infrastructure spending to five percent of GDP from the present three percent and focus investments on infrastructure bottlenecks that increase the cost of doing business.
He added that the Aquino administration must also modernize the agricultural sector; simplify the application process to build and operate power plants; create a stable regulatory environment which honors contracts with investors; address inconsistencies between increased tax collection and distortionary tax regime; and improve access to basic financial services such as credit, savings, payment of transfer remittances and insurance.
“The economy needs to grow more in order to enlarge the economic pie and ensure that 100 million Filipinos partake of it. Our economy needs to grow eight percent consistently over two decades to achieve an increase in per capita income that will bring us closer to Thailand and Malaysia,” he said.
Earlier, executives from the business process outsourcing industry in the country credited Arroyo for being responsible for the massive growth of the sector that has employed hundreds of thousands of workers.
Okay. Do you think your appreciation of Romero’s report would be the same if he identified Teves as Gloria Arroyo’s Secretary of Finance?
Look at the placards of Gabriela. “Justice for Jennifer Laude. Junk VFA” Other mini-rallies in front of the US Embassy and at the UP campus had similar placards.
Justice for Jennifer Laude that is what one would call for if one truly cared about justice for Jennifer Laude. But when one adds “Junk VFA” written in bold red letters seemingly larger than the font used in “Justice for Jennifer Laude” then the tragedy that befell Jennifer is reduced to being a means to an end. Her coffin becomes a political soapbox.
The same thing happened when a UP student committed suicide. There was very little discussion on understanding suicide because know-it-alls already knew what drove her to kill herself – it was the unequal distribution of wealth, it was anti-poor policies, and on and on and on. Coffins as political soapboxes.
Let’s respect the dead. Let’s call for justice for Jennifer Laude. Let’s not victimize the victim by using her dead body as a vehicle to advance a political agenda. Please naman Gabirela and company, do not desecrate the dead.
NOTE: Iba ito sa let’s say the funeral of Ninoy Aquino. Ninoy was seen as a martyr, spontaneously and by millions. Etong ginagawa ng Kaliwa is creating a martyr. Big difference.
In a statement last Tuesday, JV Bautista, spokesman of VP Binay and interim secretary general of UNA, said
“Senator Trillanes styles himself as a moral crusader, but all these years he has evaded the issue of how he was able to afford eight luxury vehicles with his salary in the military and why he did not declare them in his SALN. This is a clear violation of the law.”
And he added,
“Mahirap ang nagmamalinis. Kung anu-ano ang sinasabi laban kay Vice President Binay ‘yun pala sya ang may nilabag na batas at may malaking itinatago.”
Hmmm…I smell outrage and indignation, Sir JV Bautista. And I understand why because I know exactly where you’re coming from.
Oo nga naman, if I were to take your word for it, that Sen. Trillanes is also a crook, then you’re right to feel the way you do. Sen Trillanes has no business outing Binay because there should be honor among thieves – that’s the dictum you believe in, right? And so Sen.Trillanes is a jerk for breaking The Code.
But see, Sir JV, and I hate to be the one to tell you this, “Honor among thieves” is not the entire maxim. It is only a fragment. The entire saying is “There is no honor among thieves”. I’m surprised you didn’t figure that out because ‘honor among thieves’, as a stand-alone phrase, is an oxymoron.
Do you really believe that criminals are capable of living by a code of honor? Have you never heard of Al Capone’s accountant, John Gotti’s underboss Sammy “The Bull” Gravano, and, closer to home, Chavit Singson snitching on Erap, Ben Hur Luy blowing the lid off the Napoles’ scam, Ruby Tuason finking on Jinggoy? There are so many examples of criminals claiming moral ascendancy over fellow criminals I’m surprised to see you still making an issue out of it. I’m pretty sure you’re the last person in the world who still believes that crooks live by a code of honor.
Look, the only thing that matters now, the only question that needs to be answered now is this:
- are the allegations against your boss, Jejemon Binay, true or false?
Don’t waste your time and mine by stomping your feet over the breach of a code of honor that is a real as the Tooth Fairy because such behavior will just earn you a nomination to the Shit Bucket Challenge.